Legal Opinion

State of Qatar v. First American Bank of Virginia

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 3, 1995No. Civ. A. 1:94cv1081Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

At issue in this sequel to State of Qatar v. First American Bank of Virginia (“Qatar I ”) 1 is the meaning and legal significance of the phrase “for deposit only” following an indorsement on the back of a cheek. More specifically, the question presented is whether a depositary bank complies with the restrictive indorsement “for deposit only” when it deposits a check bearing that restriction into any person’s account, or whether that restriction requires a depositary bank to deposit the' check’s proceeds only into the account of the named payee. For the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sheridan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Underpinning & Foundation Constructors, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Spielman v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API