Legal Opinion

State v. Thacker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2013No. S-12-895, S-12-896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 16 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS treatment or categorizations that may follow from the workers’ compensation scheme will not always result in mathematical niceties and, in some circumstances, may lead to inequality.51 But this does not make the Act unconstitutional. The Estate has failed to sustain its burden52 of establishing the unconsti- tutionality of the Act under the equal protection, due process, special legislation, or right-to-jury provisions of the U.S. and Nebraska Constitutions. VI. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the district court’s dis- missal of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vokal v. NEBRASKA ACCOUNTABILITY AND DISCLOSURE COMM.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. FullerNebraska Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KnutsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. ErpeldingNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. RaskNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. CoveyNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. McIntyreNebraska Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API