Legal Opinion

Dexter, Horton & Co. v. Sayward

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington

Decided February 12, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Memorandum of Decision on Motion for Judgment against Sureties on Supersedeas Bond.

1Opinion of the Court

HANFORD, District Judge.

In this action a writ of attachment was issued and levied upon property of the defendant to secure the judgment, and the judgment rendered by this court contained an order to sell the attached property, and apply the proceeds to payment of the debt». The attached property has been sold for sums aggregating a great deal less than the amount of the judgment, and the plaintiff has now applied by motion for a judgment against the sureties ou the supersedeas bond for the amount of the penalty thereof, which is less than the deficiency. In the case of Hotel Co. v. Kountze,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Sayward v. Dexter, Horton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Expanded Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  2. Perry v. Tacoma Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  3. Dexter v. SaywardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API