Young v. Young's Adm'r

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Cammack

Affirming.

J. M. Young is challenging the action of the chancellor in sustaining exceptions to the Commissioner’s report allowing him a debt evidenced by a $3,000 note, with interest from October 28, 1933, against the estate of his deceased son, W. Y. Young, the estate of Earl Scott, and T. M. Stratton. The action was instituted originally by the Pikeville National Bank & Trust Company as the administrator of the estate of W. Y. Young. The widow of the deceased and the creditors, including J. M. Young, were made parties defendant. The appellant answered…