Legal Opinion

Parker v. . Stephens

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1795PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

We must not depart from the settled rules of law to avoid an inconvenience in a particular case. It is better for the individual to suffer that inconvenience than that the public should suffer a general mischief by having the rules of law rendered arbitrary and uncertain. The rule of law is well known, that an omission on the part of the executor or administrator to plead want of assets is a confession of them, so that he can never afterwards be permitted to say he had no assets to satisfy that demand. The proper judgment in such case is to be levied de bonistestatoris; for the law will not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis Ex Rel. Smith v. FaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1830
  2. King v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Borden v. . NashSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1796

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API