Serio v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STRUM, Circuit Judge.
Convicted below of unlawfully purchasing 100 capsules of heroin hydrochloride, not in or from the original stamped package, contrary to 26 U.S.C.A. § 2553(a), defendant assigns two primary errors on appeal. First, that the trial court should have suppressed certain evidence secured by a search without a warrant; second, that defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted because, on the same facts, he had been previously tried and acquitted in the courts of Louisiana of unlawfully possessing the same heroin, contrary to Louisiana Statutes Annotated…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Donald M. Wingate v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Melvin SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Robert Frederick Huff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.