Legal Opinion

Serio v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1953No. 14292PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, Circuit Judge.

Convicted below of unlawfully purchasing 100 capsules of heroin hydrochloride, not in or from the original stamped package, contrary to 26 U.S.C.A. § 2553(a), defendant assigns two primary errors on appeal. First, that the trial court should have suppressed certain evidence secured by a search without a warrant; second, that defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted because, on the same facts, he had been previously tried and acquitted in the courts of Louisiana of unlawfully possessing the same heroin, contrary to Louisiana Statutes Annotated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Donald M. Wingate v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Melvin SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  5. Robert Frederick Huff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API