Commercial Union Insurance v. Burt Thomas-Aitken Construction Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentEeanois, J.
I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in its per curiam opinion. 91 N. J. Super. 13 (App. *397Div. 1966). We should not lose sight of the fact that summary judgment was entered in favor of the bank on the pleadings and a deposition of its assistant cashier-notary public. Appellate courts have always been reluctant to grant such motions unless it appears beyond doubt that no possible factual issue appears or may be made to appear if a fair and adequate record is allowed to be presented.
The Appellate Division held that a factual question…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Butler v. OlshanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- American Surety Co. of New York v. BodenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932