Legal Opinion

Chadbourne v. White

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1921No. Civ. No. 2266Published

The facts are stated in the -opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This action is by the plaintiffs as copartners against the defendant upon a promissory note for the sum of $1,000, dated April 3, 1914, and due and payable on September’ 1, 1914. The complaint is in the usual form of such an action. In due time the defendant filed an answer, admitting the execution of the note by him and that it was given as in part payment of a certain tractor, but defending himself against the validity of the note on the ground that the tractor failed to measure up to an alleged express warranty made by the seller as to the capacity of ■the machine to perform the work for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huffman v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API