Legal Opinion

McCarty v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1904No. 2886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HEHDERSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the theft of two horses, and his' punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of four years; hence this appeal. The conviction was under article 877, Penal Code, which makes the conversion by a bailee theft.Appellant made a motion to quash the indictment because the contract of bailment, that is, its particular character, was not set out in the indictment; and because the contract of bailment was not distinctly alleged, but only inferentially stated; and because there was no averment of want of consent on the part of the person…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spangler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Calkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Elton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Varratta v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Nugent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API