Legal Opinion

Dwyer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 18, 1927No. 12180PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

The nature of this action and the applicable principles of law are fully stated in the appeals heretofore considered in the reports found in 132 S. C., 10; 129 S. E., 84 ,and 135 S. C., 303; 133 S. E., 547, and need not be here repeated.

In the second appeal the sole question for determination was the propriety of the proposed amendment submitted by the plaintiff. The appeal was decided against such amendment, and the case was remanded. In the opinion of the Court then rendered the following statements occurred:

“In estimating the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Dwyer v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  2. Cato v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Steuernagel v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. PeeblesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. Cato v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API