Legal Opinion

Thaler v. Thaler

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1932No. Docket No. 7484PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

J.—The complaint, as filed in this action, stated a cause of action against defendant for recovery of the sum of $8,929, with interest as stated. C. B. Conlin and S. Jack Cohen were plaintiff’s attorneys of record. On the face of the record it appears that after due service of summons and complaint, the default of the defendant for failure to appear was duly entered, and judgment was entered by the clerk on April 18, 1930. Four days later defendant gave notice of motion to vacate the judgment and default, and the subsequent execution and levy, on the ground that said proceedings were taken…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andrews v. JacobyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Money v. KrallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Mary Knoll Missionary Society v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Layton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. People v. VillagranaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API