Bushco v. Utah State Tax Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDurham, Chief Justice
[ 62 I respectfully dissent in part and concur in part. I agree with the majority's analysis in Part IV that the escort and companionship provisions of the Sexually Explicit Business and Escort Service Tax (the Tax) are unconstitutionally vague. I, however, do not agree with the majority's conclusion that the Tax is content neutral and thus subject to intermediate serutiny.
1 63 Despite the majority's efforts to demonstrate otherwise, this case is not the same as Erie. Rather, the Utah Legislature has enacted a statute that, by its own terms, makes it a content-based tax on First Amendment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.