Dulcio v. State

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Kernio Dulció appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, possession of marijuana, obstruction of an officer, and tampering with evidence. Dulció argues that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion for mistrial or motion for directed verdict as to the possession of marijuana count and also erred in refusing to give his requested charge on “bare suspicion.” After reviewing the record, we conclude there was no error and affirm.

The evidence at trial, taken in the light most favorable to…