Town of Holliston v. Holliston Water Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
Both parties claim title through one Stoddard. The water company claims under an alleged taking by vote of its directors on July 9, 1937, recorded, as the judge finds, on July 10, 1937. The town claims under a deed to it from Stoddard, dated July 27, 1937, expressed to be upon the condition that the land should revert to the grantor, his heirs or assigns if it was not used for the purpose of a water supply for the inhabitants, either to be sold to the Holliston Water Company, used by the town for its own supply, or sold to another water company supplying the town. The premises were conveyed…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- VIDAL v. Girard's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Attorney General v. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. TuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. HawkOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Dyer v. SianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burnham v. Mayor & Aldermen of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Jubinville v. JubinvilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- McAuliffe & Burke Co. v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Crystal Spring Finishing Co. v. Town of FreetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- McElligott v. LukesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997