Legal Opinion

Weade v. Washington (City)

Fayette County Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 15, 1955No. 21718PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S DEMURRER TO SECOND PARAGRAPH OF DEFENDANT’S SECOND AMENDED ANSWER.

OPINION

By CASE, J.

This cause comes before the court upon Plaintiff’s demurrer to the second paragraph of Defendant’s second amended answer.

Since it is a fundamental and established rule of law that such a demurrer searches the record (31 O. Jur., Pleading, Secs. 202 and 203, at pages 781 through 785), the court deems it suitable to quote from said pleadings as hereinafter set forth.

Plaintiff’s petition reads as follows:

“Plaintiff is an individual; defendant is a municipal corporation organized and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Bucyrus v. State Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Neal v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Estey v. GreenvilleOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smejkal v. Empire Lite-Rock, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API