Legal Opinion

Barney-Yeboah v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 2015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, Supreme Court’s order reinstated, and the certified question answered in the negative. This is not the type of rare case in which the circumstantial proof presented by plaintiff “is so convincing and the defendant’s response so weak that the inference of defendant’s negligence is inescapable” (Morejon v Rais Constr. Co., 7 NY3d 203, 209 [2006]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Rivera, AbdusSalaam, Stein and Fahey concur; Judge Pigott dissents and votes to affirm for reasons stated in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morejon v. Rais Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Barney-Yeboah v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cantey v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Hafeez v. TT of FreeportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Maroonick v. Rae Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API