Legal Opinion

Gaston v. Keehn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 8, 1943No. 30100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The question for decision is whether or not the defendant is bound by the proceedings in the Illinois courts. It is admitted that by accepting the policy and paying the premium the defendant became a member of the company, and as a member “he thereby assumed the'obligations and liabilities of members as imposed by said policy,” but it is contended that in so doing he was “not bound by the provisions of the by-laws or by the laws of Illinois, or assumed any obligations imposed by such by-laws, or such laws,” and was not bound by the assessment made against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Mutual Life Insurance v. PhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Selig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Barnwell Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. Keehn v. Parrish Dray LineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  3. Gem State Mutual Life Ass'n v. O'ConnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API