Legal Opinion

Davidson Investment Co. v. Dabney

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1930No. Docket No. 6269PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

The defendant, appealing from a judgment on the pleadings, seeks a reversal thereof upon three grounds: First, that material issues were raised by his answer; second, that the pleading of affirmative matter as a defense barred the plaintiff from taking such judgment, and third, that the refusal of the court to allow him to amend his answer was reversible error.

The complaint is in the form common to actions in claim and delivery. It alleges the ownership and right of possession in the plaintiff of a certain automobile, that the value thereof is $1500, that the same is in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Naftzger v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Seabury v. Doe ex dem. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coykendall v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Transmarine Corp. v. R. W. Kinney Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. North v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Watkins v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API