Legal Opinion

Carlingswitch, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 18, 1980No. C.D. 4873. Court No. 79-12-01947PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment and on Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

MALETZ, Judge:

Plaintiff voluntarily tendered $91,992.35 to Customs in connection with a penalty investigation under section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1592) for understating the value of certain shipments of switches, indicator lights and related products. Subsequently, Customs refused to refund the monies thus tendered. Plaintiff then brought this action to obtain recovery.

Defendant has moved to dismiss the action or alternatively for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Alberta Gas Chemicals, Inc. v. BlumenthalUnited States Customs Court · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Syva Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. Carlingswitch v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. ITT SEMICONDUCTORS v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  4. Tikal Distributing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. Playhouse Import & Export, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API