Legal Opinion
Cindy Osuna v. Target Corporation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 6, 2023No. 2:22-cv-07960Unknown
1Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-07960-ODW-PVC Document 19 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:244 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 CINDY OSUNA, Case № 2:22-cv-07960-ODW (PVCx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 v. REMAND [10] 14 TARGET CORPORATION et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 On November 1, 2022, Defendant Target Corporation removed this slip-and-fall 19 case to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. (Notice of Removal (“NOR”), 20 ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff Cindy Osuna now moves to remand. (Mot. Remand (“Motion” 21 or “Mot.”), ECF…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Grancare v. Ruth ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.