Legal Opinion
United States v. Keller
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 25, 1990No. 89 CR 793PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HART, District Judge.
Before the court are a number of pretrial motions of the defendants. 1 They are discussed below.
Motions to Dismiss or Strike The Indictment
Defendants have moved to dismiss or strike various portions of the indictment. A sufficient indictment should state all the elements of the offense, inform the defendant of the charges so he or she may prepare a defense, and enable the defendant to plead the judgment as a bar to a later prosecution. United States v. Gironda, 758 F.2d 1201, 1209 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1004, 106 S.Ct. 523, 88…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Mickens, Anthony Jacobs, Shelby Kearney, Bettina Jacobs Celifie, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Collins v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- United States v. Law Firm of Zimmerman & Schwartz, P.C.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- Gang v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992