Legal Opinion

Pardue v. James

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1889No. 6310PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Hill. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Collard, Judge.

Plaintiff sues by injunction to restrain the execution of a -writ of restitution issued from the County Court upon a judgment rendered in a proceeding of forcible detainer against him and J. D. Pardue, upon the ground that 49 acres of the land claimed by him is not embraced in the description of the land as given in the judgment or the writ. Defendants pleaded and the court admitted evidence to show that the description contained in the judgment was not controlled by the call for distance on the south line of the. survey.

Plaintiff based his right to the injunction upon the one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. North v. SwingTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. Wheeler and BowmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Minor v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Meade v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Houston Rice Milling Co. v. HankamerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Texas Co-Op. Inv. Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API