Aviv Knitwear Corp. v. Greiner Maltz Co.

In an action to recover damages for breach of an indemnity agreement, the *566defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated March 20, 1997, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion, in effect, for summary judgment on the first cause of action in the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“When the provisions of a contract are clear and unambiguous, the interpretation thereof is a question of law and effect must be given to the parties’ expressed intent” (Campagna v Braun, 124 AD2d…