Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Daues

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 14, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Upon re-assignment this cause has fallen to me. It is an original proceeding here in certiorari, to quash the record of the St. Louis Court of Appeals in the case of Herman Kistenmacher v. Travelers Indemnity Company, recently pending, and decided by the St. Louis Court of Appeals. The only question in the case is the alleged conflict of opinions. The opinion of the Court of Appeals is short, and we think well reasoned (if its soundness of reasoning were a question here), and that all the facts may be before us we quote such opinion in full, as follows:

“This is an action brought by plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. Erb v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Mechanics' Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. C. A. Hoover Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  5. Sumner v. SummersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. DancigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Kansas City Operating Corp. v. DurwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Kansas City Operating Corporation v. DurwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  4. Barone v. Glens Falls InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Noall v. DickinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API