Legal Opinion

United States v. Yarbough

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided June 15, 1990No. NMCM 89 0295CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLEVER, Judge:

Appellant raises three assignments of error on appeal: he asserts (1) his pleas were improvident, (2) he failed to receive the effective assistance of counsel because no objection was made to a record of nonjudicial punishment offered in aggravation during presentencing when an appeal was still pending, and (3) his sentence was inappropriately severe. We are unpersuaded and affirm, but the second assignment of error merits discussion. The issue is whether trial defense counsel’s failure to object to the admissibility of a nonjudicial punishment which was on appeal at time of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. DukesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. LarneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ElstonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. KahmannNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  3. United States v. YarboughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API