Legal Opinion
Romano v. Lynch
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided July 1, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 84-3424PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & REASONS
CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon motion of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc. [hereafter “Merrill Lynch”], to dismiss the second amended complaint of Joseph A. Romano with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Background
Plaintiff’s suit places at issue two types of transactions, occurring between March *2701981 and April 1983: (1) Silver commodities trading undertaken on plaintiff’s behalf; and (2) Associated deposits and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alex John, Jr. v. State of Louisiana (Board of Trustees for State Colleges and Universities)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Armstrong v. McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,048 Milton E. Dupuy v. Clarence O. Dupuy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- James White v. Carl ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- S. John Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., a Partnership, and Thomson & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joseph A. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987