Legal Opinion

State v. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 5, 1995No. C2-94-2469Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This case arises from the warrantless entry into appellant Peter Dean Paul’s home to arrest him for driving while under the influence of alcohol. After an Omnibus hearing, the trial court found that the warrantless entry and arrest did not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution or article I of the Minnesota Constitution, because the crime was committed in the officer’s presence. Paul then waived his right to a jury trial, entered a conditional guilty plea pursuant to State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854, 857 (1980), and brought this appeal. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API