Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Meagley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The action is for damages for injury to person and property through a collision between automobiles owned by plaintiff and defendant. The jury’s verdict was no cause of action.

Five witnesses were sworn in behalf of plaintiff, who were either drivers or passengers in the three automobiles involved in the mishap; and the defendant was the only eyewitness sworn in his *470own behalf. The testimony of all these witnesses, taken in connection with the conceded facts as to the points of contact of the two colliding automobiles and giving full credence to defendant’s story as to the location of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Felska v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. People v. GaynorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoffer v. BurdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Colligan v. FeraCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  3. Burke v. Tower East RestaurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API