Legal Opinion

Franklyn v. Hayward

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

The defendant Hayward, who held a junior mortgage, was not made a party to the action in which a judgment of foreclosure and sale was made under a "previous mortgage executed by Richard M. Tweed. That foreclosure, did. not affect the defendant Hayward, and his interest remained the same as though that foreclosure had not been *44ordered. The omission to make Hayward a party to the previous foreclosure action arose' through a mistake of fact. The register did not, on his return to the requisition of the plaintiffs in that action for incumbrances, make any mention of the Hayward mortgage, and he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benedict v. Gilman & CouchNew York Court of Chancery · 1833

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moulton v. . CornishNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Dekum v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. New York Public Library v. TildenNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Smith v. RobertsNew York Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API