Legal Opinion
Moore v. United States Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 7, 2001No. 99-2100PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
In March 1996 Phillip B. Moore, a commercial truck driver, suffered a detached retina in his left eye that resulted in loss of vision. As a result, Moore no longer meets the Federal Highway Administration’s vision requirements that apply to interstate drivers of commercial vehicles, 49 C.F.R. § 391.41(b)(10). Section 391.41(b)(10)’s vision standard requires that commercial truck drivers have 2%o vision (Snellen) in each eye. Because he could no longer meet the FHWA’s vision standard, Moore immediately relinquished his commercial license issued by the State of Colorado, and moved to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sandra Remer v. Burlington Area School District, Larry Anderson, William C. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Michael Cousins v. Secretary of the United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Aulenback, Inc. And Truckers United for Safety v. Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- John P. Clark v. Samuel K. Skinner, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ruggiero v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Krueger v. Advent Health System/WestDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Ruggiero v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Ruggiero v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002