State v. Thomas
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Dissent
ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J.,
concurring and dissenting.
I concur in the conclusion of the majority that Thomas’s conviction should be affirmed. As to the sentence of death, however, I respectfully dissent. As I have previously expressed in a long line of dissents, I believe that the comparative proportionality review protocol currently embraced by the majority is inadequate to shield defendants from the arbitrary and disproportionate imposition of the death penalty. See Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-206(c)(1)(D) (1995 Supp.). I have consistently expressed my displeasure with the current protocol since…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court.
2Cases cited99 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.