People v. Rogers

*1015Defendant’s sole argument on appeal is that his conviction should be set aside based upon the prosecutor’s failure to obtain an advance ruling from the court on the admissibility of certain testimony elicited on redirect examination of a key prosecution witness which allegedly disparaged defense counsel. Defendant did not object to the testimony on that ground at the time of trial and, thus, has not preserved that issue for appellate review.

In any event, even if we were to address the issue, we would find that defendant’s argument lacks merit. The extent of redirect examination is, for the…