Welch v. Hill
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
The judgment based on the jury verdict returned against the plaintiff, the award of attorney fees, and the imposition of costs on the plaintiff pursuant to the Alabama Litigation Accountability Act, § 12-19-270, Ala.Code 1975, are affirmed. The plaintiff, as appellant, acting pro se, has filed a brief that does not contain a “full statement of the facts relevant to the issues presented for review, with appropriate references to the record” and does not contain “citations to the parts of the record relied on,” which are required by Rule 28(a), Ala.R.App.P. Thomason v. Redd, 565 So.2d 259…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Sea Calm Shipping Co., S.A. v. CooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Jenkins v. Landmark Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Thomason v. ReddCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Roberson v. RileyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gorman v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Baugus v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Cavalier Manufacturing, Inc. v. GantSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Clements v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Baugus v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.