Williams v. Bond
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HERGET, Judge.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek judgment against the defendant because of the alleged tortious acts of defendant in (1) illegally repossessing a motor vehicle which defendant had sold to plaintiff, Valley Williams, and (2) resulting from an alleged assault and invasion of privacy of plaintiffs.
After hearing the case, the Trial Court, for oral reasons assigned, rendered judgment rejecting the demands of plaintiffs and dismissed their suit. It is from this judgment plaintiffs have appealed to this Court.
On July 31, 1957 plaintiff, Valley Williams, purchased from defendant a…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Fortenberry v. ScoginLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963