McWilliams v. Morton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.
It is true that the appellant James Morton, as he asserts in his demurrer to the amended complaint, has no interest in the real estate described therein which could be partitioned. His recorded encumbrance was by its terms fastened only upon the moiety of the real estate owned by the defendant Clara L. B. Morton, and his interest in the property is confined within her moiety and is identical with her individual interest. She continued as cotenant to be the owner of her interests, and the other cotenants’ rights to a partition of the real estate were not disturbed by James Morton’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Joyce v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Johnson v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Whiting v. GaylordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Yudkin v. GatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Waterbury Trust Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Asner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Levay v. LevaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Miner v. MarshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Asner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.