Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher Jansen

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 7, 2018No. 17-1005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Flaum, Circuit Judge.

*652 Defendant Christopher Jansen pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud and one count of tax evasion. He later sought to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing it was not "knowing and voluntary" because of ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court denied that motion, holding that Jansen's counsel was not ineffective. We affirm. On the limited issue of restitution, we remand to allow the district court to clarify that its imposition of restitution is a condition of supervised release rather than a criminal penalty.

I. Background

A. The Conduct, Investigation, & Charge

D…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Warren Barr, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. John Gleason v. Chris JansenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. MemarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. COVARRUBIAS v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
  5. Godinez v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API