Legal Opinion
St. Louis Rose Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided October 30, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The question before us calls for a definition of the term “agricultural labor” as it is used in our Unemployment Compensation Law.
A former employee of the St. Louis Rose Company was allowed unemployment benefits by the Unemployment Compensation Commission. Upon review by the circuit court the decision of the commission was reversed and the commission has appealed.
The company has about twenty-one acres of land in St. Louis County on which are located four greenhouses which cover about ten per cent of the acreage. It raises and sells roses and other flowers. The employees of the company are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Hill v. Georgia Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Bucher v. American Fruit Growers Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Park Floral Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Hein v. LudwigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Town of Lincoln v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Oak Woods Cemetery Ass'n v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Rogers v. PoteetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Dost v. Pevely Dairy CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Mid-Continent Aerial Sprayers, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.