Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1965No. 44,041Published

1DissentFontron, J.

I am not concerned over the failure to have counsel appointed for petitioner at the time of his preliminary examination. This court has consistently held that the preliminary hearing is not a critical stage in the trial process (see cases cited in the courts majority opinion) and I see nothing in the circumstances of this case which would warrant any deviation from our previous holdings.

Nor do I discern any infringement upon the petitioner’s basic rights simply because he negotiated with the county attorney without benefit of counsel. This is a common practice, frequently employed by habitual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Green v. KensingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. J. C. Nichols Co. v. MeredithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Dunfee v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API