Legal Opinion

Kulp v. Heimann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1911No. 16,554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Cuming county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Action in ejectment to obtain possession of an undivided one-fourth of the northeast quarter of section 3, township 21 north, of range o east of the sixth P. M., situated in Cuming county, Nebraska. The cause was tried to the district court without the intervention of a jury. The trial resulted in a judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The errors assigned and relied on for a reversal are, in substance, as follows: The findings and judgment of the district court are contrary to law; the findings and judgment of the district court are not sustained by the evidence.

It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Borcher v. McGuireNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garfield Oil Co. v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Battey v. BatteyNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API