Legal Opinion

Gooding v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1986No. 84-753PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

We are asked to review the denial, after a hearing, of appellant John Gooding’s Rule 32(e) motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to kidnapping. In the trial court, appellant argued that his plea was involuntarily entered and that it was fair and just that it be withdrawn. On the record before us, we conclude that withdrawal of the plea should have been permitted as fair and just under the circumstances, and also that the plea was accepted without an adequate inquiry pursuant to Rule 11. We reverse and remand on these two independent grounds, so that appellant can have…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Springs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Pettiford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API