Legal Opinion

Kinasz v. Dickson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 2018No. 106068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Mary Kinasz, individually and as the executor of the estate of Justyna Kinasz ("appellant"), brings this appeal challenging the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Blake Dickson, et al. ("Dickson"), regarding appellant's claim for legal malpractice. Specifically, appellant argues that genuine issues of material fact existed that precluded the granting of summary judgment. After a thorough review of the record and law, this court affirms.

I. Factual and Procedural History

{¶ 2} The instant matter…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. NajarOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kalski v. BartimoleOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Shaut v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Roe v. Connolly, Hillyer & OngOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Thomas v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API