Kinasz v. Dickson
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Mary Kinasz, individually and as the executor of the estate of Justyna Kinasz ("appellant"), brings this appeal challenging the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Blake Dickson, et al. ("Dickson"), regarding appellant's claim for legal malpractice. Specifically, appellant argues that genuine issues of material fact existed that precluded the granting of summary judgment. After a thorough review of the record and law, this court affirms.
I. Factual and Procedural History
{¶ 2} The instant matter…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. NajarOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kalski v. BartimoleOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Shaut v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Roe v. Connolly, Hillyer & OngOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Thomas v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2026