Hoffman v. Southern Railroad

OPINION

CLAIBORNE, - J.

Plaintiff attempted to pass betwen two coupled cars and was injured. Hence this suit. The defendant filed an exception of no cause of action which was sustained and plaintiff’s suit dismissed. He has appealed.

The plaintiff’s' allegations are as follows:

II. “That on or about the 8th day ' of January, 1921, your petitioner was employed along the river front between Marigny and Press Streets, in the City of New Orleans, and that in order to get to and from his work it was necessary that he cross the tracks of the said corporation and their connecting lines at the head of…