Beissell v. Sholl
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
4 U.S. 211 (____)
4 Dall. 211
Beissell
versus
Sholl.[(1)]
Wagoner
versus
Same.
Supreme Court of United States.
CASE, for diverting a water course. The COURT left the facts to the jury, under this general statement of the law: "That every man, in this country, has an unquestionable right, "to erect a mill upon his own land; and to use the water, passing "through his land, as he pleases: subject only to this limitation, "that his mill must not be so constructed and employed, "as to injure his neighbour's mill; and that, after using the "water, he returns the stream to its ancient channel."
NOTES
[(1)]…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Blanchard v. BakerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1832
- Philips v. StocketTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1806
- Binney's CaseHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1829
- Merritt v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1795