Legal Opinion

Beissell v. Sholl

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1800PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4 U.S. 211 (____)

4 Dall. 211

Beissell

versus

Sholl.[(1)]

Wagoner

versus

Same.

Supreme Court of United States.

CASE, for diverting a water course. The COURT left the facts to the jury, under this general statement of the law: "That every man, in this country, has an unquestionable right, "to erect a mill upon his own land; and to use the water, passing "through his land, as he pleases: subject only to this limitation, "that his mill must not be so constructed and employed, "as to injure his neighbour's mill; and that, after using the "water, he returns the stream to its ancient channel."

NOTES

[(1)]…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. BakerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1832
  2. Philips v. StocketTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1806
  3. Binney's CaseHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1829
  4. Merritt v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1795

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API