Legal Opinion

Frew v. Bowers

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 1, 1926No. 284PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Consideration of the problem presented seems to require some definition of the nature of the tax imposed. To call it, as it is officially called, an estate tax, does not advance the matter, for the phrase merely indicates the incidence of the charge, not its nature or species.

We think that authority, rather than speculation on the reason of things, must control definition, and we premise by holding that this tax, like any similar burden imposed by the nation rather than a state, is an excise upon the right or privilege (it matters not which word is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Child Labor Tax CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Lewellyn v. FrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Barclay & Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re KarlinskiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
  2. In Re McKinney's EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  4. Fesler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  5. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API