Legal Opinion

Owensboro Banking Co. v. Buck

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1918No. 6 Div. 277PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from City Court of Bessemer; J. C. B: Givin, Judge. Suit by F. B. Buck against tlie Bransford Mills of Kentucky, in which the Owensboro 'Banking Company filed a claim for property attached. From a judgment holding the property subject to attachment, the Banking Company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, J.

[1J The Bransford Mills of Kentucky shipped a carload of flour to themselves, order notify T. D. Lewis Grain Company, at Bessemer. They took a standard bill of lading for same, and on the same day drew a draft payable to themselves for $630, and, with the bill of lading attached, deposited said draft and bill of lading, indorsed “Bransford Mills, by N. M. Waltrip, Secretary,” with the Owensboro Banking Company,' getting credit with that institution for the amount of draft, less exchange. The Owensboro Banking Company indorsed the draft and sent it and the bill of lading to tbe United Savings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Cosmos Cotton Co. v. 1st National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Hood v. Com. Germania T. & S. Bank of New OrleansAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Veitch v. Atkins Grocery & Commission Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BILL WHITE ROOFING, ETC. v. Cedric's, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Farmers' Exchange Bank v. Greil Bros. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Ex Parte BuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API