Legal Opinion
Claim of Smith v. City of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 25, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 30, 1997, which ruled that claimant did not sustain an accidental injury in the course of her employment and denied her claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
Claimant, a parking monitor, was returning to work after eating at a restaurant on her unpaid lunch break when she fell on a wet floor located in front of the elevator leading out of the restaurant. The Workers’ Compensation Board denied claimant benefits on the ground that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. We affirm.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Smith v. United States Trucking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Claim of Coningsby v. New York State Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pabon v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Bond v. Suffolk Transportation ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Huggins v. Masterclass MasonryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Claim of Rose v. Verizon New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Gabriele v. Educational Bus Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.