State v. Pleasant
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion below. 313 N.J.Super. 325, 712 A.2d 1215. We conclude that the jury instruction concerning the offense of employing a juvenile in a drug distribution scheme, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-6, did not constitute reversible error.
Although we are in accord with the majority’s finding that the jury charge was adequate, we agree with the dissenting member’s observation that N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5(a), one of the statutes on which a violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-6 may be predicated, is potentially ambiguous. 313…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ConcepcionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. LaBruttoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- State v. PleasantNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WalkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- State v. WhitakerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- State v. PigueirasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. B.D., JR. (14-05-0334, SALEM COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. VERNON J. PARKER(09-03-0830 AND 09-04-1087, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.