Vistar, S.A. v. M/V Sealand Express
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DeANDA, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs motion to amend final judgment and Defendant Sea-Land Service, Inc.’s motion for final judgment on mandate. For the following reasons, the Court orders that Plaintiffs motion is denied and Defendant’s motion is granted.
The relevant facts are set forth in the Court’s prior findings of fact and conclusions of law. This is a suit for damage to a varnishing machine sustained during transport from LeHarve, France, to Nuevo Laredo, Mexico. The varnishing machine was packed for transportation, presumably intact, in a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Noritake Co., Inc. v. M/v Hellenic ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/v Peisander, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Waterman S. S. Corp. v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Binladen Bsb Landscaping v. M v. "Nedlloyd Rotterdam", Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., Nedlloyd Lijnen B v. (Nedlloyd Lines)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Brazil Oiticica, Ltd. v. the BillDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1944
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Realini v. Contship Containerlines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999