Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Avco Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 25, 1984No. C-820858PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.
On March 20, 1981, appellants filed a complaint against ap-pellees Avco Corporation (“Avco”) and Cincinnati Electronics Corporation (“C.E.”). The complaint, containing five claims for relief, requested the court to declare the case to be a class action. On June 19, 1981, appellants filed a “Motion for order determining that action be maintained as a class action,” accompanied by a supporting memorandum. Both Avco and C.E. filed memoranda in opposition to the motion. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court, in a letter opinion, denied appellants’ motion to have the case certified as a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,173 Michael Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., Ann Flamm and Arnold Flamm v. Rudolph Eberstadt, Jr. And Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Nolvert P. SCOTT, Jr., Appellant, Etc. v. the UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Berdysz v. Boyas Excavating, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Safi v. Cent. Parking Sys. of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Bennett v. FirstEnergy Corp.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 2002
- Donna Vizcaino v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996