Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Hurt

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 7, 1958No. 10,533Published

1DissentFerguson, Judge

(dissenting):,, I dissent.

Because of the death penalty, this *789ease reaches us for a mandatory review by virtue of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

At the outset of the case, the accused moved for a change of venue on the basis of intense public prejudice on Okinawa and the disqualification of the convening authority, who was also the civilian governor of the Ryukyus group. The law officer denied the defense motion. This motion was supported by introducing a summary of the daily Okinawan Press for the period of September 6th through November 9th, 1955. Also introduced was the substance of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Eastern, Etc., Plow Co. v. Stout, Exrx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API